Some interesting research has recently been published. Is it time to start to consider a) non-antipsychotic prophylactic interventions and b) stage specific treatments?
There seem to be differing views:
1. Early intervention with pharmacological and social interventions is critical. Under the biomedical model, schizophrenia is a severe, highly disabling and lifelong condition:
“Clinicians should be encouraged to treat early to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis, particularly delusions. The emergence of psychosis is a very important time to intervene, and even subtle symptoms could herald future deterioration. The goal is to treat effectively, aiming for full remission of psychotic symptoms. In doing so, clinicians should offer their patients a full armamentarium of interventions to improve their long-term outcome and functioning. This includes combining medication with cognitive-behavioral or other therapies to minimize stress and optimize psychosocial outcome; and using job coaching, cognitive remediation, or other strategies to achieve and retain a full functional recovery.”
“Diagnostic classification and its often stigmatizing effects do not do justice to the uncertainty of prognosis nor the potential inefficiency and risks of routine pharmacological approaches. Prescription of neuroleptics should be cautious and postponed, especially given the availability of sound alternatives with more modest, short-term roles for medication…
Eradicating [symptoms] pharmacologically, even if patients understandably request this, is not always a realistic treatment goal. Limitations in the existing evidence base for neuroleptic medication for voices have been highlighted, and it has been argued that there is not enough robust evidence to support the routine administration of such medication for voice-hearers (who are diagnosed with psychosis)”
⇒ For psychosocial interventions, see Phase-Specific Recovery from Schizophrenia
3. Holistic and spiritual approaches may be effective:
“…some psychiatric states are opportunities for spiritual growth rather than intrinsically destructive psychopathologies”
Accumulating evidence indicates that therapeutic interventions to prevent transition from clinical high risk (CHR) status to fullblown psychosis can be successful (Stafford et al. 2013; Ruhrmann et al. 2010b; Yung et al. 2007). Recent metaanalysis of CHR intervention trials (van der Gaag et al. 2013) found that antipsychotic treatment [number needed to treat (NNT) = 7], cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) (NNT = 14) and supplementation with omega-3 oils (Amminger et al. 2010) (NNT = 5) are all effective in preventing transition to psychosis at 1-year post-presentation with CHR symptoms (van der Gaag et al. 2013; Fusar-Poli et al. 2013b). These values compare favourably with other interventions in medicine to prevent chronic illnesses, for example in pre-diabetes (metformin NNT = 14 and lifestyle changes NNT = 7 at 3 years), or prodromal cardiovascular disease (anticoagulant therapy NNT = 25 at 2 years) (Fusar-Poli et al. 2014a). However, there is a high rate of at-risk individuals who maintain CHR status for long periods of time before either transitioning to psychosis or remitting spontaneously.
Based on a meta-analysis, over 60 % of individuals identified as CHR will not have transitioned 3 years after identification (Fusar-Poli et al. 2012a) and at least 30 % identified by basic symptoms criteria will not have transitioned by nearly 10 years (Klosterkotter et al. 2001). This has led to concerns regarding unwarranted diagnostic labelling and resultant distress, stigma and discrimination (Yang et al. 2010; Ruhrmann et al. 2012). For example, intervention with antipsychotic treatment carries the risks of side effect burden and of unknown impact on normal brain development during adolescence and early adulthood (Corcoran et al. 2010), and the use of antipsychotics is associated with the extent of progressive grey matter volume decreases and lateral ventricular volume increases observed in CHR individuals who transition to schizophrenia (Fusar-Poli et al. 2013c).
Together, the concerns regarding the relatively low transition rate of the CHR state and the risk of adverse effects of early antipsychotic treatment have lead to conservative approaches of CHR management. Clinical guidelines focus on careful monitoring, and on the provision of relatively benign interventions such as family therapy and omega-3 supplementation in the first instance, and recommend antipsychotic treatment only for those at the immediate threshold of psychosis (Fusar-Poli et al. 2014a). However, antipsychotic medication still has the strongest cumulative evidence for prevention of transition (van der Gaag et al. 2013), and some CHR individuals may ‘miss out’ on effective treatments because of overly cautious guidelines. Therefore, the field has recognized the need to develop better predictive models, combining clinical findings with evidence from emerging prognostic technologies, to tailor therapies to individual needs, according to a clinically acceptable risk–benefit ratio.
Antipsychotic drugs have thus far focused on dopaminergic antagonism at the D2 receptors, as counteracting the hyperdopaminergia in nigrostriatal and mesolimbic projections has been considered mandatory for the antipsychotic action of the drugs. Current drugs effectively target the positive symptoms of psychosis such as hallucinations and delusions in the majority of patients, whereas effect sizes are smaller for negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions. With the understanding that neurocognitive dysfunction associated with schizophrenia have a greater impact on functional outcome than the positive symptoms, the focus in pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia has shifted to the potential effect of future drugs on cognitive enhancement. A major obstacle is, however, that the biological underpinnings of cognitive dysfunction remain largely unknown. With the availability of increasingly sophisticated techniques in molecular biology and brain imaging, this situation is about to change with major advances being made in identifying the neuronal substrates underlying schizophrenia, and putative pro-cognitive drug targets may be revealed. In relation to cognitive effects, this review focuses on evidence from basic neuroscience and clinical studies, taking two separate perspectives. One perspective is the identification of previously under-recognized treatment targets for existing antipsychotic drugs, including myelination and mediators of inflammation. A second perspective is the development of new drugs or novel treatment targets for well-known drugs, which act on recently discovered treatment targets for cognitive enhancement, and which may complement the existing drugs. This might pave the way for personalized treatment regimens for patients with schizophrenia aimed at improved functional outcome. The review also aims at identifying major current constraints for pro-cognitive drug development for patients with schizophrenia.
Recently, differing results with regard to structural changes have been published:
” …there is minimal evidence of an association between untreated psychosis and brain structure in first episode psychosis (FEP)” [a]
” [there are] extensive white matter tracts anomalies in patients with schizophrenia, more specifically, in drug-naïve FEP patients. The results also indicate that a small number of white matter tracts share common FA anomalies that relate to deficit symptoms in FEP patients. Our study adds to a growing body of literature emphasizing the need for treatments targeting white matter function and structure in FEP patients.” [b] [See review]
“…results suggest that the progression of brain abnormalities in first episode psychosis subjects is restricted to those with a poor outcome and differs between diagnosis subgroups. Antipsychotic intake is associated with a different pattern of grey matter reductions over time.” [c]
“The lack of significant difference in neuroinflammation in treated patients with SCZ in the midst of a psychotic episode and healthy volunteers suggests that neuroinflammatory processes may take place early in disease progression or are affected by antipsychotic treatment.” [d]
Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder with a broad spectrum of clinical and biological manifestations. Due to the lack of objective tests, the accurate diagnosis and selection of effective treatments for schizophrenia remains challenging. Numerous technologies have been employed in search of schizophrenia biomarkers. These studies have suggested that neuroinflammatory processes may play a role in schizophrenia pathogenesis, at least in a subgroup of patients. The evidence indicates alterations in both pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules in the central nervous system, which have also been found in peripheral tissues and may correlate with schizophrenia symptoms. In line with these findings, certain immunomodulatory interventions have shown beneficial effects on psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia patients, in particular those with distinct immune signatures. In this review, we evaluate these findings and their potential for more targeted drug interventions and the development of companion diagnostics. Although currently no validated markers exist for schizophrenia patient stratification or the prediction of treatment efficacy, we propose that utilisation of inflammatory markers for diagnostic and theranostic purposes may lead to novel therapeutic approaches and deliver more effective care for schizophrenia patients.
“…the hypothesis of abnormal immune system development presented here helps to unify and explain a broad range of findings from diverse fields, including epidemiology, genetics, immunology, neurophysiology, and pharmacology. It suggests that early immune system programming influenced by the disruptive effects of pre- and perinatal adversity combines with abnormal central nervous system (CNS) development to produce schizophrenia. While complementing neurodevelopmental theories of schizophrenia, it offers a more complete integration of key findings on schizophrenia and helps explain the growing set of research findings linking schizophrenia to numerous immune abnormalities, including altered immune cell activities, inflammation, immune-related genes, infections, and auto-immune disorders.
These findings on patients with schizophrenia are complemented by a large and growing body of evidence from experiments with laboratory animals. These experiments have shown that prenatal exposure to adverse environmental conditions such as infection can disrupt development of both the immune and nervous systems, with effects on immune function, behavior, and brain structure that can be manifested much later in development, during puberty and adulthood.
One interesting feature of our hypothesis is that it suggests several novel approaches to treatment and prevention of schizophrenia. A number of these approaches appear to be ones that could be readily tested, and could be implemented in ways that are ethical and relatively economical.”
New treatment strategies
Bolstering immune function
“One treatment strategy suggested by the hypothesis would be to employ practices that bolster immune function, by helping schizophrenia patients to follow procedures that have been shown to reduce inflammatory responses and improve defense against infection. These include, for example, insuring a balanced diet and ample levels of sunlight exposure, to insure adequate levels of vitamin D. A complementary approach would insure that patients practice regular moderate exercise and stress management—a regimen that some controlled experiments have found to reduce inflammation and improve resistance to infectious diseases.”
Diagnosing and treating unrecognized infections and immune disorders
“Because the hypothesis suggests that schizophrenia patients’ symptoms may sometimes be promoted by unrecognized and/or untreated infections, another strategy could involve more careful testing for untreated infections, and trials with targeted anti-viral or antibiotic regimes. Similarly, treating previously unrecognized immune disorders, or investigating medications to reduce high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, could be an informative test. As part of their disability, schizophrenia patients are less likely to seek out medical care and/or follow treatment recommendations. Thus, it may become important to regularly screen for infections as part of standard psychiatric care. Of note, adherence to anti-viral, antibiotic, or anti-inflammatory medication regimes may be greater than adherence to antipsychotics, as they tend to be better-tolerated, and carry less illness-related fear and stigma.”
⇒ For more information: Inflammation and immunology in schizophrenia
Impact of treatment
“Although short-term treatment with antipsychotics was associated with prefrontal cortical thinning, treatment was also associated with better cognitive control and increased prefrontal functional activity.” [d]
“… antipsychotic drugs significantly reduce the secretion of TNF-α, nitric oxide, IL-1β, and IL-2 from activated microglia. Furthermore, some drugs were found to have stronger inhibitory effects, e.g., risperidone, which inhibited the secretion of several cytokines from activated microglia more than haloperidol, and indications of clozapine-specific effects have also been reported. Moreover, in the context of the kynurenine pathway, one animal study demonstrated that chronic treatment with antipsychotic drugs reduces brain KYNA. Meyer et al. reviewed the influence of antipsychotic treatment on peripheral cytokines in clinical populations and found that antipsychotics reduced the level of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, sIL-6R, TNF-α) while increasing peripheral production of anti-inflammatory substances such as (sIL-1RA, sIL-2R and IL-10). Here, SGAs seemed to have the most pronounced effects and a possible relation between the ability to normalize immune function and clinical effects were identified.” [e]
The rest of this post will focus on pharmacological interventions.
Aspirin, estrogen, EPO, minocycline, N-acetylcysteine, neurosteroids, melatonin, lipoic acid, omega-3 PUFAs, other anti-inflammatory interventions and antioxidants have all been suggested as early interventions [1, 2]
N-acetylcysteine shows promise as a relatively safe intervention. One study found a mediator effect of duration of illness on response/treatment outcome:
Schizophrenia is a chronic and often debilitating disorder in which stage of illness appears to influence course, outcome, prognosis and treatment response. Current evidence suggests roles for oxidative, neuroinflammatory, neurotrophic, apoptotic, mitochondrial and glutamatergic systems in the disorder; all targets of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). A double blind, placebo controlled trial suggested NAC to be beneficial to those diagnosed with schizophrenia. The current manuscript aims to investigate duration of the illness as a key factor that may be modulating the response to NAC in the participants who took part in the study. A sample of 121 participants were randomised in a double fashion to 24 weeks (placebo=62; NAC=59). Clinical and functional variables were collected over the treatment period. Duration of the illness at baseline was grouped into <10 years, 10-<20 years and >20 years. Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis was used to explore the effect of illness duration on response to treatment with NAC. A significant interaction between duration of the illness and response to treatment with NAC was consistently found for positive symptoms and functional variables, but not for negative or general symptoms or for side effect related outcomes. The pattern of changes suggests that this mediator effect of duration of illness in response to treatment is more evident in those participants with 20 years or more of illness duration. Our results suggest a potential advantage of adjunctive NAC over placebo on functioning and positive symptoms reduction in those patients with chronic schizophrenia. This has potential for suggesting stage specific treatments.
“In accordance with the staging model, progressive neurobiological abnormalities occur over the course of schizophrenia. Our results are consistent with the broader theoretical model of neuroprogression, potentially mediated by free radical-mediated neurotoxicity, inflammation, apoptotic pathways, mitochondrial dysfunction or neurogenesis in schizophrenia on which antioxidant therapeutic strategies such as NAC may counteract some of the effects which contribute to persistent schizophrenic symptomatology and complications of its treatment In that regard NAC has been shown to potentially impact on oxidative biology, both by increasing glutathione levels and directly scavenging free radicals. It has also shown to decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines, reverse models of
mitochondrial toxicity, reduce apoptosis and enhance neurogenesis, factors also pertinent to the persistent pathophysiological progression of schizophrenia .The effects derived from chronicity in terms of the progression of oxidative stress imbalance may provide a substrate on which NAC may be more effective with its correspondent implications for response. Interestingly results from this study provide new insights into the plausible underlying mechanisms which may help to clarify the outcomes of the main trial, which improved global measures of psychopathology (including total, general and negative components of the PANSS) but failed to report beneficial effects on positive symptoms for the group of patients as a whole Beneficial effects of NAC, particularly in positive symptoms, might be mediated by the duration of the illness. NAC may replenish GSH, counteracting oxidative stress and modulating glutamate receptors which have been linked to thepresence of negative symptoms thus diminishing its severity over the course of the illness. Positive symptoms have been related to dopaminergic dysfunction which according to the immune-inflammatory-glutamate dysfunction hypothesis would be more persistent on relapse or chronic states. Stage of illness may thus have an impact on treatment response to adjunctive treatment with antioxidants such as NAC.With regard to the staging paradigm, our results add to the notion that differential treatment response may occur in the different stages of the illness. With conventional antipsychotics, patients in the earlier stages of the illness appear to have a better response to treatmentEven though this raises the possibility that the primary reason for the higher efficacy of NAC in late stages of SZ might be that antipsychotics are relatively effective at alleviating the symptoms in early-stage patients, thereby obscuring any beneficial effects of NAC in this subgroup. That treatment with NAC seems to be more effective in individuals with long-standing symtoms suggests that it might be operating on the pathways to neuroprogression rather than the primary dopaminergic abnormality that antipsychotics target. This might be due to the reviewed evidence of greater damage secondary to oxidative stress with greater chronicity, which might suggest a greater substrate on which NAC might work.Results derived from this study may thus shed light on the plausible biological substrate that underlies illness progression and on the use of potential adjunctive treatments such as NAC that may counteract functional outcomes at different stages. Although more research on specific metabolic pathways on which NAC may interact is required, our data supports thehypothesis that NAC may have an impact on the pathways to neuroprogression in schizophrenia. The results derived from this study bring us closer to both more personalised approaches by defining a clinical pathological model of staging in psychosis by shedding light on the biological impact of adjunctive treatment with NAC on symptomatological and functional outcomes of the illness.
In our sample NAC has shown to be an effective treatment at an advanced stage of the disorder when response to treatment may be hard to be observed constituting an ideal and safe treatment option to reverse long-term disability of chronic patient”
Abnormal development can lead to deficits in adult brain function, a trajectory likely underlying adolescent-onset psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia. Developmental manipulations yielding adult deficits in rodents provide an opportunity to explore mechanisms involved in a delayed emergence of anomalies driven by developmental alterations. Here we assessed whether oxidative stress during presymptomatic stages causes adult anomalies in rats with a neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion, a developmental rodent model useful for schizophrenia research. Juvenile and adolescent treatment with the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine prevented the reduction of prefrontal parvalbumin interneuron activity observed in this model, as well as electrophysiological and behavioral deficits relevant to schizophrenia. Adolescent treatment with the glutathione peroxidase mimic ebselen also reversed behavioral deficits in this animal model. These findings suggest that presymptomatic oxidative stress yields abnormal adult brain function in a developmentally compromised brain, and highlight redox modulation as a potential target for early intervention.
In an animal model myelin maturation, glutathione level and redox regulation deficits were “reversed by either the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine or Fyn kinase inhibitors” 
“…minocycline may protect against gray matter loss and modulate fronto-temporal areas involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Furthermore, minocycline add-on treatment may be a potential treatment in the early stages of schizophrenia and may ameliorate clinical deterioration and brain alterations observed in this period.” .
“Treatment with the antibiotic minocycline (3mg/kg/day) normalized microglial cytokine production in the hippocampus and rescued neurogenesis and behavior. We could also show that enhanced microglial TNF-α and IL-1β production in the hippocampus was accompanied by a decrease in the pro-proliferative TNFR2 receptor expression on neuronal progenitor cells, which could be attenuated by minocycline. These findings strongly support the idea to use anti-inflammatory drugs to target microglia activation as an adjunctive therapy in schizophrenic patients.” [3b]
“In a clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Amminger et al., a markedly decreased progression rate to psychosis was found in at risk subjects receiving high-dose polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). PUFAs are involved in the myelination process, and peripheral PUFA levels have been found to be decreased in schizophrenia. A recent DTI study in early-phase psychosis patients found an association between level of PUFAs in peripheral erythrocytes and white matter integrity. Possibly, PUFA distribution is altered in patients at risk for psychosis, with a link between PUFA levels and white matter integrity. Free radicals can damage membrane PUFAs, and disturbances in fatty acids and membrane phospholipid identified in patients with schizophrenia may be caused by increased oxidative stress according to a review by Yao and Keshavan. The same authors point to disruption of antioxidative systems related to schizophrenia, with reduced amounts of non-enzymatic plasma antioxidant components [e.g., albumin, bilirubin, uric acid, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), α-tocopherol (vitamin E)], see also the recent clinical study by Zhang et al. demonstrating a reduced plasma total antioxidant status in a sample of schizophrenia patients. Interestingly, PUFAs also have mild anti-inflammatory effects”
“Compared to placebo, ω-3 PUFAs’ significant effects on the amplitude of the reduction in General and Total PANSS scores are evident after the first four weeks of treatment; a reduction of positive symptoms and a lower mean PANSS positive score were apparent after eight weeks, whereas the significant drop in negative symptoms and the significant change and higher mean scores in global functioning occur later at 12weeks. The delay of onset of ω -3 PUFAs seems comparable to that of antipsychotics and antidepressants.” 
“We found no evidence that ω-3 PUFAs+α-LA could be a suitable alternative to maintenance antipsychotic treatment in relapse prevention, in this small study. Antipsychotic discontinuation after a single episode of schizophrenia carries a very high risk of relapse, and treatment guidelines endorsing this practice should be revised.” 
“…supplemental omega-3 might increase efficacy of conventional antipsychotics in decreasing symptoms of schizophrenia. Low price, rare adverse reactions and availability of omega-3 made this substance a potential supplement in improved treatment of schizophrenia” 
“Neurosteroids perform a variety of actions that impact critical brain functions such as modulation of inhibitory GABAergic and excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmitter systems, myelination, reduction of apoptosis, and reduction of inflammatory responses. Pregnenolone and its metabolite pregnenolone sulfate, belong to the group of neurosteroids found in high concentrations in certain areas in the brain which positively modulate excitatory glutamatergic NMDA receptors. Pregnenolone administration results in elevations in downstream neurosteroids, such as allopregnanolone, a molecule with neuroprotective effects that also increases neurogenesis, decreases apoptosis and inflammation (thus its downstream anti-inflammatory function), modulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and markedly increases GABA (A) receptor responses. Pregnenolone and its sulfate ester are under investigation for their potential to improve cognitive and memory functioning. Emerging preclinical and clinical evidence suggests pregnenolone may be a promising novel therapeutic candidate in schizophrenia.” 
The etiology of schizophrenia remains unclear while, in many aspects, the neuropathology of schizophrenia has recently been reported to be closely associated with microglia dysfunction. Microglia, which are the major players of innate immunity in the CNS, respond rapidly to even minor pathological changes in the brain and contribute directly to neuroinflammation by producing various pro-inflammatory cytokines and free radicals. Recent human studies have revealed microglial activation in schizophrenia using postmortem brains or in vivo neuroimaging techniques. We and other researchers have recently shown the inhibitory effects of some antipsychotics on the release of inflammatory cytokines and free radicals from activated microglia, both of which have recently been known to cause the synaptic pathology, a decrease in neurogenesis, and white matter abnormalities often found in the brains of patients with schizophrenia. In addition, recent evidence strongly suggests a neurodevelopmental role of microglia in regulating synapse formation/function by their interaction with synapses and phagocytotic activity. It is not known whether microglia dysfunction and microglia-orchestrated neuroinflammation are the primary cause of schizophrenia but they are closely related to the progression and outcomes of schizophrenia. Understanding microglial pathology may shed new light on the therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia.
Psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and major depressive disorder were thought to be caused by neurotransmitter abnormalities. Patients with these disorders often experience relapse and remission; however the underlying molecular mechanisms of relapse and remission still remain unclear. Recent advanced immunological analyses have revealed that M1/M2 polarization of macrophages plays an important role in controlling the balance between promotion and suppression in inflammation. Microglial cells share certain characteristics with macrophages and contribute to immune-surveillance in the central nervous system (CNS). In this review, we summarize immunoregulatory functions of microglia and discuss a possible role of microglial M1/M2 polarization in relapse and remission of psychiatric disorders and diseases. M1 polarized microglia can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and nitric oxide, suggesting that these molecules contribute to dysfunction of neural network in the CNS. Alternatively, M2 polarized microglia express cytokines and receptors that are implicated in inhibiting inflammation and restoring homeostasis. Based on these aspects, we propose a possibility that M1 and M2 microglia are related to relapse and remission, respectively in psychiatric disorders and diseases. Consequently, a target molecule skewing M2 polarization of microglia may provide beneficial therapies for these disorders and diseases in the CNS.
L-type voltage-gated calcium channels have been found to modulate microglial pro-inflammatory activity and may be an attractive target for therapeutics 
Microglia are resident innate immune cells which release many factors including proinflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide (NO) and neurotrophic factors when they are activated in response to immunological stimuli. Recent reports show that pathophysiology of schizophrenia is related to the inflammatory responses mediated by microglia. Intracellular Ca2+ signaling, which is mainly controlled by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), is important for microglial functions such as release of NO and cytokines, migration, ramification and deramification. In addition, alteration of intracellular Ca2+ signaling underlies the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, while it remains unclear how typical or atypical antipsychotics affect intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in microglial cells. This mini-review article summarizes recent findings on cellular mechanisms underlying the characteristic differences in the actions of antipsychotics on microglial intracellular Ca2+ signaling and reinforces the importance of the ER of microglial cells as a target of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Pharmacological MAGL inactivation may be an effective protective strategy:
“…monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inactivation robustly preserved myelin integrity and suppressed microglial activation in the cuprizone-induced model of T-cell-independent demyelination. These findings suggest that MAGL blockade may be a useful strategy for the treatment of immune-dependent and -independent damage to the white matter.” 
Vitamin D may play a role in the pathogenesis of psychiatric illness . Multiple relevant neurotransmitter pathways, immune function and inflammation are all influenced by vitamin D status  Developmentally vitamin D deficient animals show increased behavioural deficits in a NMDA antagonist model of schizophrenia and “a transient vitamin D deficiency has a long-lasting effect on NMDA-mediated signalling in the rodent brain and may be a plausible candidate risk factor for schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.  Clinical trials are underway to determine if antipsychotic induced weight gain may be related to a vitamin D deficiency 
1,25(OH)2D3 has a direct effect on neural stem cell proliferation, survival, and neuron/oligodendrocyte differentiation, thus representing a novel mechanism underlying its remyelinating and neuroprotective effect.
In patients with hyperhomocysteinemia, adjunctive administration of B Vitamins [a complex of folic acid, cobalamin (B12), and pyridoxine (B6)] produced improvements in neurocognitive outcomes over placebo.